Wednesday, March 5, 2014

THE TROUBLE WITH TEXAS TRIBBLES

Looking downtown from SoCo
Living in Austin, I've lost touch with how most people experience Texas politics. I'm walking distance from the capitol. I don't have to worry about parking if I want to testify, participate in a rally, or to just sit in to see government in action. Retail politics, too, has the same immediacy. Watching election returns at a campaign party is a wonderfully social occasion - less so with a losing campaign. Still, I'm used to being in the thick of things if I'm into it at all.

Unfortunately, I've been stricken with what is likely the flu since Sunday. I'd expected it would clear in time so I could head out to a few election events last night. Instead, I decided to "listen to my body." And it said "no, don't go."  So I stayed home and watched the evening 's events unfold from both my TV and my computer. 

As far as the TV's concerned, there wasn't much. I don't have cable, so I had to wait for the returns on the local news. In the meantime, the broadcast schedule droned on as if were any other day. Actually, that's just what it was for most Texans - a day like any other. The vast majority declined to exercise their franchise. Most of what was decided was decided by default.
Texans did their usual - from the Texas Civic Health index

Much to the chagrin of Democrats, their all-out effort to turn non-voters into active participants in our democratic society apparently yielded little in the way of results. The peculiar status quo here in Texas seems sure and steady. We live in a modern industrialized society reaping the benefits of science and technology. However, political control is conferred on those who profess a pre-scientific understanding of the world. The Internet and other communication technologies are used to reinforce these beliefs.

Civic engagement at home
I spent a good deal of time in the evening exposed to another highly touted response to this civic disengagement. I experienced the Texas Tribune as it is meant to be experienced - online. Usually, I go to their in-person events. Here, I had another go at the "Livestream" phenom - various reporters talking about races in-between victory speeches and the like from campaigns. I watched off-and-on while looking for the latest on particular campaigns. How was it? It was bad "live" TV, a notch above the stuff you surf past on local cable access. The "plus" is that the Tribbles actually have something intelligent to say, even if they do better putting their words into type instead.

So this is the answer to civic disengagement? Then I switched to the TV news. They had less to say, but polished it up more. 

Then, this morning, I reconnected with the Trib's Livestream to see the "Post-Primary Debrief," a reporter's roundable. It was a lively talk about who fared well or worse in the horserace. After the reporters had their say, it went to a Q&A. It seems that at least one non-politico made it to the room. He asked about the real-life significance of this news event.

A round table with no table at all
'That was a terrific overview of the politics of the results last night. I would love to hear your assessment of the impact on governance - of the ability of Texas elected officials to come together to address the great problems and challenges that Texas faces."

A momentary pause followed.   

'We're not going to hear much of that until at least November," said Emily Ramshaw, Editor.
 
'....The voice last night was not about governance. That's not what we're talking about at this point....' explained Ross Ramsey, Executive Editor and Co-Founder.

Maybe that explains the pervasive disengagement of the public. Politics, it would seem, suffers from civic disengagement, too. 
   
The hour-long session ended about 10 minutes short for a lack of questions from the audience.

###


Tips? Suggestions? Ideas? Drop a line to carl (at) inanityofsanity (dot) com

3 comments:

  1. Among the statewide media, it seems that actual care for and true passion about the living and working conditions of the people of Texas and their lives remains solely with The Texas Observer. These people should be wearing white lab coats and advising citizens to take two aspirins and donate to me in the morning.

    Also, the leg of the chair on the far left of the stage was very close to the edge and could easily have slipped off. Maybe next time.

    Smith should realize he's no Dick Cavett or David Frost. He does seem technically awake.

    L.P.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I finally realized the word I've been searching for to describe the Tribbles' business model.

    Tawdry.

    L.P.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Texas Observer, which I also strongly support, has a VERY different business model - and reach. The Trib is hardly "tawdry." The problem may be that it is too upscale. The question is what are the compromises inherent to this "comfortable" business model? What happens when you don't "stay hungry"? Also, the dislike I see for Evan Smith is inappropriate. Let's give the man credit - he HAS set something quite remarkable in motion. Part of the problem is that our sense of how great the Trib might or should be can belittle what is. Now, that's an enviable predicament for a not-for-profit.

    Also, he is PLENTY talented as a talk show host and provocateur - doesn't have to be a Dick Cavett (my personal hero). If he isn't already, he certainly SHOULD be on the short list at PBS for when Charlie Rose retires. BUT - his talents as on-air talent is above & apart from his work heading the Trib. In fact, one of the major concerns should be what will they do IF he leaves to fill Charlie's shoes at PBS. Has he sufficiently empowered this organization so it has taken on a life of its own, or is it crippled without him?

    ReplyDelete